Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8562 AP
Judgement Date : 8 November, 2022
1
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. RAVINDRA BABU
TRANSFER CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.8 OF 2022
ORDER:-
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2) This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed
under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure with a prayer to
transfer F.C.O.P.No.1408 of 2021, on the file of V Additional
District Judge-cum-Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam to the
Court of III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada.
3) The contention of the petitioner in brief is that she is
the legally wedded wife of the respondent. Their marriage was
performed on 12.04.2014 at Amalapuram. Subsequently, there
was difference cropped up. While so, the respondent filed
F.C.O.P.No.1408 of 2021, on the file of V Additional District
Judge-cum-Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam, with false
allegations. The petitioner is residing at Kovvuru, Kakinada
Rural. It is at a distance of 160 Kms. from Visakhapatnam. It is
very difficult for the petitioner to travel. The petitioner filed
H.M.O.P.No.288 of 2021 on the file of III Additional Senior Civil
Judge, Kakinada under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act, seeking
restitution of conjugal rights. She has no independent source of
income. It is very difficult for her to attend the Court at
Visakhapatnam. Hence, the petition.
4) Though the respondent filed a counter opposing the
prayer of the petitioner, but, on 21.10.2022 across the Bar,
learned counsel for the respondent represented that if the Court
is going to grant any relief, time bound directions may be given
to the trial Court to dispose the matter expeditiously.
5) Now the point that arises for consideration as to
whether the petitioner is entitled for transfer of F.C.O.P.No.1408
of 2021, on the file of V Additional District Judge-cum-Judge,
Family Court, Visakhapatnam to the Court of III Additional
Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada?
POINT:-
6) As seen from the case of the petitioner, she pleaded
that it is very difficult to her to go to Visakhapatnam Court to
contest the same and on the other hand, she also filed
H.M.O.P.No.288 of 2021 before the III Additional Senior Civil
Judge, Kakinada, seeking restitution of conjugal rights. The
facts and circumstances are such that both the matters have to
be disposed by one Judicial Officer to avoid any conflicting
judgments.
7) Having regard to the above and as the respondent
has no serious objection to pass the prayer and considering the
submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondent
across the Bar on 21.10.2022, it is desirable, in the interest of
justice, to grant the relief prayed.
8) In the result, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous
Petition is allowed withdrawing the F.C.O.P.No.1408 of 2021
from the file of V Additional District Judge-cum-Judge, Family
Court, Visakhapatnam and transferring the same to the Court of
III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, for disposal of the
same along with H.M.O.P.No.288 of 2021, in accordance with
law, expeditiously not later than six (06) months from the date
of receipt of the record. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any,
shall stand closed.
________________________ JUSTICE A.V. RAVINDRA BABU Dt.08.11.2022.
PGR
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. RAVINDRA BABU
Tr.C.M.P.NO.8 OF 2022
Date: 08.11.2022
PGR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!