Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1391 AP
Judgement Date : 22 March, 2022
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
MAIN CASE No: Crl.P.No.7286 of 2021
PROCEEDINGS SHEET
Sl. OFFICE
NOTE
No. DATE ORDER
DR,J
02. 22.3.2022
I.A.No.01 of 2021
Dispensed with for the present.
Crl.P.No.7286 of 2021
Petitioners are permitted to take out
personal notice on R2 through RPAD and file proof
of service.
I.A.No.02 of 2021
Petitioners are A1 to A4. Basing on the
complaint dated 28.8.2019, respondent-police had
investigated and filed charge sheet and the same is numbered as C.C.No.455/2019 on the file of the XVI Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Bheemunipatnam, Visakhapatnam District. Learned counsel Mr. Nipun Saxena appearing on behalf of the petitioners had contended that the marriage itself is not valid. Because the defacto complainant has got divorce on 25.7.2018 by the order of the civil court Senior Level Panvel in Hindu Marriage Petition No.291/2017 which reads as follows:
...Petition is allowed. The marriage of petitioner No.1 and 2 is declared dissolved with effect from today's date. Decree should be made as per above."
Even according to the complaint dated 28.8.2019 clearly shows that the defacto complainant got marriage the 4th petitioner on 28.4.2018 in Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh. So in view of the same, even before the date of granting divorce, she married the 4th petitioner. Hence marriage itself is not in accordance with the Sl. OFFICE NOTE No. DATE ORDER
provisions of the Act.
Further learned counsel has submitted that the 4th petitioner has filed petition for dissolution of marriage before the Chief Justice Family Court Shivpuri Madhya Pradesh and the same is numbered as S.H.M.No.34/2019 and the same petition was allowed with the following observation
...Resultantly the present suit is accepted and the decree is passed as follows:
a. That the suit as filed on behalf of the plaintiff Anirudh Khanwalkar for declaring the marriage solemnized with the defendant dated 28.4.2018 as void u/s 11 r/w section 5 of Sub-Section(i) of Hindu Marriage Act and for the declaration of dissolving the marriage u/s 12-1(c) of Hindu Marriage Act on the basis of the consent of the marriage obtained fraudulently by hiding the important facts, is allowed and the marriage solemnized between the parties on dated 28.4.2018 is declared void from the judgment passed today and from the decree dated 13.9.2019 passed in compliance of it.
b. That the plaintiff Anirudh is directed that by providing a copy of the judgment to the defendant Sharmiladas by registered post or personally, submit its service/information in the Court.
c. That the plaintiff himself will bear the cost of the suit. The fees of his advocate, whichever is less as per the list or out of two thousand rupees, should also be mentioned as per rule 523 of Civil Rules and orders.
In view of the declaration made by the competent civil court saying that the marriage between the complainant herein and the 4th petitioner is void, there shall be stay of all further proceedings in Cr.No.455/2019 on the file of the P.M.Palem police station, Visakhapatnam.
Post after four (04) weeks.
________
DR, J
RD
Sl. OFFICE
NOTE
No. DATE ORDER
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!