Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3526 AP
Judgement Date : 5 July, 2022
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
MAIN CASE No:C.C.No.1803 of 2022
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. OFFICE
DATE ORDER
No NOTE.
RNT,J
3. 05.07.2022 1. Heard Sri Jada Sravan Kumar, learned counsel
for the petitioner.
2. Challenging the order of his relieving dated
09.02.2022, the petitioner filed W.P.No.4374 of 2020, in
which the operation of the order impugned dated
09.02.2022 was stayed, till the decision was taken by
the respondent No.3/the Principal Government Dental
College & Hospital, Vijayawada, Krishna District, interms of the judgment dated 04.02.2022 in W.P.No.20604 of 2020.
3. The order dated 21.02.2022 is reproduced as under:-
"Heard Sri Jada Sravan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Vadapalli Ramesh, AGP for Services - IV, representing for all the respondents.
Learned AGP for Services - IV prays for two weeks time to file counter.
The petitioner has challenged the order of his relieving dated 09.02.2022, by which, he has been relieved from the duties of Assistant Librarian Government Dental College and Hospital, Vijayawada.
Challenging the discontinuance of his services on contract basis, the petitioner filed W.P. No. 20604 of 2020, in which an interim order was granted, directing the respondents to continue the petitioner as Assistant Librarian in the college of respondent No.3 on contract basis subject to payment of salary until further orders. This Court noticed that in previously filed writ petition, in WPMP.No.15705/2010 in W.P.No.12453/2010, vide order dated 03.06.2010 & 30.06.2010, the petitioner was directed to be continued in service. Alleging non-compliance the petitioner filed C.C.
No. 296 of 2021 and during its pendency, the 3rd respondent passed an order dated 20.01.2022 and thereby permitted the petitioner on contract basis to attend the duties as Assistant Librarian in the existing vacancy of Assistant Librarian in the said college for a period of one year, subject to SLPs./WPs/Was/RPs/OAs/Cases etc., if any, pending before the Courts of law. The WP.No.20604 of 2020 along with W.P. No. 12453
of 2010 was decided finally by judgment dated 04.02.2022 dismissing W.P.No.12453/2010 and with respect to W.P.No. 20604 of 2020, this court keeping in view the submission that the petitioner is solely dependent on the post in question, left it open to the respondents to consider the petitioner's case for appointment, in any suitable post, in any of the existing vacancies. The petitioner by the impugned order dated 09.02.2022 has been relieved from the duties of the Assistant Librarian. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed on contract basis for a period of one year and against the existing vacancy of Assistant Librarian in the college, which is evident from the order dated 20.01.2022 and therefore, in view of the order passed in W.P.No.20604/2020, the respondents should have considered the petitioner's case for appointment, in a suitable post and ought not to have relieved the petitioner on 09.02.2022 arbitrarily and that too in violation of the principles of natural justice. Prima facie, this Court is of the view that once this court in W.P. No. 20604 of 2020 granted liberty to the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's case against some existing vacancies in any suitable post and as in view of the interim order, the petitioner was given appointment on contractual basis for a period of one year w.e.f 20.01.2022 against the existing vacancy, the 3rd respondent ought to have considered the petitioner's case pursuant to the liberty granted to respondent No.3 before relieving the petitioner vide order dated 09.02.2022.
Under the circumstances, the operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed till the decision is taken by the 3rd respondent in terms of the judgment dated 04.02.2022 in W.P.No.20604 of 2020.
List on 07.03.2022."
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant submits that the copy of the interim order was served to respondent No.3 on 24.02.2022, but the petitioner/applicant was not permitted joining on the post of Assistant Librarian in the college of the respondent No.3.
Later on, an order dated 04.05.2022 was passed by the respondent No.3 requesting the respondent No.2 to issue an order to the Principal to appoint the petitioner in the existing vacancy of Junior Assistant on contract basis for a period of one year, also mentioning that there was no existing vacancy in the cadre of Assistant Librarian post and as such the petitioner cannot be accommodated in the post of Assistant
Librarian.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents are disobeying the interim order dated 21.02.2022, as the petitioner has not been allowed to join the post of Assistant Librarian, inspite of there being stay of the relieving order dated 09.02.2022 nor any final order giving appointment to the petitioner, even for the post of Junior Assistant, has been passed.
Prima facie, in view of the aforesaid, the respondent Nos.2 and 3 are disobeying the interim order dated 21.02.2022.
Accordingly, issue notice to the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to show cause as to why the proceedings for contempt of Court for willful disobedience of the order dated 04.02.2022 passed in W.P.No.20604 of 2020, be not proceeded with for their punishment.
Let the respondent Nos.2 and 3 file response through counsel by the next date.
List on 08.08.2022.
________ RNT,J Scs
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!