Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 986 AP
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2022
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.4678 OF 2022
ORDER:
This petition is filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
"....to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents herein more particularly Respondent No.2 herein in not considering the representation made by the Petitioner dated 03.12.2021 for laying a 60 feet road proposed to be constructed/laid on the middle part of Plot No.17 situated in Sy. No. 335/5P of Madhurawada Village, Visakhapatnam District as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust, violative of the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Metropolitan Region Development Authority Act, 2019 and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and Consequently direct the Respondent No.2 herein to consider the representation made by the Petitioner herein on 03.12.2021.."
2. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the
respondents, during hearing, Sri N.Ashwini Kumar, learned counsel
for petitioner limited his request to dispose of representation, dated
03.12.2021 pending before respondent authorities, without touching
the merits of the case.
3. Learned Government Pleader for Municipalities appearing for
respondents readily agreed to dispose of the representation, dated
03.12.2021, if any, pending with the respondent-authorities.
4. Recording the submissions made by the learned Government
Pleader for Municipalities, I need not decide the truth or otherwise of
the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no
such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in
"The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1", wherein the Apex
Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of
2019 (8) SCALE 544 cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not
serve to the cause of justice. However, upon considering the
averments made in the Writ Petition and on hearing the arguments of
the learned counsel for the petitioner, this court find no other
alternative remedy except to issue a direction to dispose of the
representation, dated 03.12.2021 pending before respondent
authorities.
5. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing
respondents to dispose of the representation, dated 03.12.2021
pending before him, in accordance with law, within
a period of six (06) weeks from the date of a receipt of copy of this
order. No costs.
6. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any pending
shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE T. RAJASEKHAR RAO
Date: 17.02.2022 Psr
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
(Disposed of)
WRIT PETITION NO.4678 OF 2022
Date: 23.02.2022
Psr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!