Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5146 AP
Judgement Date : 12 August, 2022
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE No:Arbitration Application No.193 of 2014
PROCEEDING SHEET
SL. DATE ORDER OFFICE
NO. NOTE
11 12.08.2022 RRR, J
The present application has been filed for
appointing an arbitrator, for claiming the
preservation and maintenance charges that are
said to be due to the applicant, under the
Agreement dated 09.07.2010.
The arbitration clause in the said
agreement provides for referring all disputes to
arbitration. This clause is not disputed by the
respondent and is infact admitted by the
respondent in the counter filed by it. Clause 10 does not stipulate as to the venue or seat of arbitration. However, it is stated that Courts at Hyderabad would have jurisdiction. In such circumstances, it would be the Courts at Hyderabad which would have to decide this application. The lack of the words only or any stipulation it is only at Courts at Hyderabad that would have jurisdiction would also not arise in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Swastik Gases Private Limited vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited.1.
In the circumstances, this application needs to be sent back to the Hon'ble High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad for appropriate consideration and disposal.
Registry is directed to take necessary orders and dispatch this application back to the High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad.
________ RRR, J RJS
(2013) 9 SCC 32 SL. DATE ORDER OFFICE NO. NOTE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!