Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3854 AP
Judgement Date : 30 September, 2021
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE: SECOND APPEAL No.472 of 2021
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Date ORDER OFFICE
No. NOTE
1. 30.9.2021 MVR,J
Second Appeal No.472 of 2021
Heard Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Potturi,
learned counsel for the appellants.
Admit. The following are the substantial
questions of law:
1. Whether the judgment and decree of appellate
Court is perverse and contrary to the material
evidence?
2. Whether the appellate Court below gravely erred
in interpreting Section 90 of Indian Evidence
Act and the judgment of Shaik Bikkam Ali @
Gulam Mod Sarvar?
3. Whether Courts below gravely erred in taking
into consideration the inadmissible/irrelevant
evidence like filing of caveat and not giving reply
to Ex.A.3 Lawyer Notice?
Issue notice to the respondents to submit
arguments in respect of the above substantial questions of law (Arulmighu Nellukadai Mariamman Tirukkoil vs. Tamilarasi (dead) by LRs., AIR 2019 SC 3027 followed).
List during the 3rd week of December 2021.
________ MVR,J I.A.No.1 of 2021 Heard.
There shall be interim stay of the decree dated 30.11.2017 in O.S.No.359 of 2007 on the file of the Court of learned Senior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram, confirmed in A.S.No.1 of 2018, by the Decree and Judgment dated 17.3.2021 on the file of the Court of learned Principal District Judge, Vizianagaram, until further orders, and notice.
________ MVR,J vasu
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!