Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3807 AP
Judgement Date : 28 September, 2021
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE NO.: S.A.No.402 of 2021
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Date ORDER OFFICE
No. NOTE
5 28.09.2021 MVR,J Tr. to I-
S.A.No.402 of 2021 O folder
before
Heard learned counsel for the appellant. correcti
ons if
Upon consideration of the decrees and judgments of the
any.
trial Court as well as the 1st appellate Court, since the Pl.verify
.
following substantial question of law arises for determination in the second appeal, ADMIT.
1. Whether from the mere evidence of the Scientific Officer, DW., the court can on the basis of the provision of Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act treat the signature on the Ex.A1 as forged?
2. Whether the courts below are correct in not exercising the discretion under Section 20 of the Specific Preference Contract of Sale more particularly when the plaintiff proved execution of contract of such by examining the attestor on it as PW.2?
3. Whether the courts below are justified in not drawing an inference with regard to the proof of execution of Ex.A1 contract of sale, more particularly when DW.1(defendant) admitted that the plaint schedule property is in the possession of plaintiff and that he did not take any legal action against appellant/plaintiff?
Issue notice to the respondent. List the matter during the last week of December, 2021.
______ MVR,J I.A.No.2 of 2021
Issue notice to the respondents.
______ MVR,J
Pab
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!