Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3561 AP
Judgement Date : 16 September, 2021
1
CMR, J.
W.P.No.16996 of 2021
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
Writ Petition No.16996 of 2021
ORDER:
This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India is filed seeking mandamus declaring the action on the
part of respondents 2 and 3 in not closing the F.I.R. in Crime
No.18 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under
Sections 448, 355, 509, 506, 323 r/w.34 of IPC against the
petitioner by Chinnachowk U/G Police, YSR Kadapa District,
even after the case ended in acquittal as per the Award passed
by the Lok Adalat on 14.03.2015, as illegal and
unconstitutional and consequently, sought direction to the
police to close the aforesaid F.I.R.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for
the respondents.
3. As per the facts pleaded, it appears that a case in
Crime No.18 of 2015 was registered against the petitioner by
Chinnachowk U/G Police, YSR Kadapa District, for the offences
punishable under Sections 448, 355, 509, 506, 323 r/w.34 of
IPC. During the pendency of the trial of the case, it is stated
that both the de facto complainant and the petitioner entered
into a compromise and as per Award passed by the Lok Adalat
on 14.03.2015 in LAC No.103 of 2015 on the file of the District
Legal Services Authority, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District, the
CMR, J.
W.P.No.16996 of 2021
petitioner was acquitted in the said case. However, it is stated
that as the F.I.R. copy, which was uploaded in the website of
the Police Department, has not been deleted, that when the
petitioner got employment as a Constable in CISF that the
concerned authority is not issuing appointment order on the
ground that the petitioner got criminal background on account
of registration of aforesaid crime. Therefore, the petitioner is
before this Court by way of filing this Writ Petition seeking the
aforesaid relief.
4. The only grievance of the petitioner is that as the F.I.R.
is still available in the website of the Police Department even
after his acquittal in the said case, as per the Lok Adalat Award
dated 14.03.2015, that appointment order is not being given to
him even after he was selected for the post of Constable in CISF
and as the said F.I.R. is now still available in the website of the
Police Department and that it is being an impediment for him
to seek employment in Government service.
5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home
appearing for the respondents, on instructions, would submit
that as per the prevailing system, whenever any case is
registered, the concerned F.I.R. will be uploaded in the official
website of the Police Department and even the result of the case
will be noted in the said website. So, after the petitioner was
acquitted as per the Lok Adalat Award, dated 14.03.2015, the
said fact that the petitioner was acquitted was also shown in
CMR, J.
W.P.No.16996 of 2021
the official website of the Police Department. Therefore, the fact
that the said F.I.R. is still available in the website of the Police
Department cannot be an impediment to the petitioner to
secure any employment in the Government service. He would
further submit that even the Superintendent of Police, Kadapa
District, also issued police verification certificate to the
petitioner certifying that the petitioner, who is accused No.3 in
the above Crime No.18 of 2015, was acquitted as per the Lok
Adalat Award, dated 14.03.2015, on account of the compromise
that was entered into between both the de facto complainant
and the petitioner. Therefore, this certificate would be ample
evidence for the petitioner to place before the concerned
authorities to show that he was acquitted in the said case.
6. The petitioner has produced the proceedings dated
26.06.2021 issued to him by the office of Deputy Inspector
General, CISF, directing him to appear before the Standing
Screening Committee with certain documents which are
specified in the table shown in the said proceedings. As per
said proceedings, he was also directed to produce the judgment
relating to the said case. Therefore, the petitioner is at liberty
to appear before the said Standing Screening Committee along
with the judgment showing his acquittal i.e. Lok Adalat Award
and also the police verification certificate issued by the
Superintendent of Police, Kadapa, in proof of his acquittal in
the said case. So, without appearing before the said Standing
Screening Committee with the aforesaid documents to
CMR, J.
W.P.No.16996 of 2021
substantiate before the committee that he was acquitted in the
said case, the petitioner has now approached this Court by way
of filing this Writ Petition seeking a direction to police to delete
the F.I.R. from the website of the Police Department.
7. As per the programme that was arranged by the Police
Department, it is brought to the notice of this Court by the
learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home that once the
F.I.R. is uploaded in the website, that it cannot be deleted and
only the result of the case will be shown in the website.
8. Therefore, in the said facts and circumstances of the
case, there is no merit in the contention of the petitioner that
there has been inaction on the part of the police concerned in
not deleting the F.I.R. from the website of the Police
Department. The bona fide acts of the police are very much
apparent from the police verification certificate that was issued
by the Superintendent of Police, Kadapa, certifying that the
petitioner was acquitted in the said case.
9. Ergo, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction
to the petitioner to place the police verification certificate and
the Lok Adalat Award before the concerned authority for the
purpose of showing that he has been acquitted in the said case
and it cannot be an impediment for his appointment as CISF
Constable in Government service. If still the concerned
authorities reject his candidature for any such appointment in
the Government service on the ground that F.I.R. is available in
CMR, J.
W.P.No.16996 of 2021
the website of Police Department, the petitioner is at liberty to
question the same before the Court of law. No costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending if any,
shall stand closed.
________________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY Date:16.09.2021.
cs
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!