Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tata International Limited, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh,
2021 Latest Caselaw 4725 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4725 AP
Judgement Date : 19 November, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Tata International Limited, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 19 November, 2021
             THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI

                  WRIT PETITION No.21644 OF 2021

ORDER:

Heard Sri Neha Panday, learned counsel for the petitioner and

Sri P.Subash, learned Government Pleader for the respondents,

apart from perusing the material available on record.

2. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India for the following relief:

"To issue writ, an appropriate order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus. A. Declaring Respondents to immediately restore the distrained property to the petitioner. B. Declaring the action of Respondent No.2 and 4 in issuing Notice bearing Rc.No.141/2021/A dated June 11-2021 along with From No.1 (Distrain Order) under Section 8 of the Revenue Act to Respondent No.5 but wrongfully attaching the Property of Petitioner who is not a defaulter is ultra vires, illegal and arbitrary.

C. Declaring the inaction of Respondent No.2 in not replying/not taking any action against the Letter dated June 11-2021 after being clearly informed that the Property has been wrongfully attached, as being illegal, arbitrary and malafide.

D. An order, direction or writ may kindly be issued quashing the Notice bearing Rc.No.141/2021/A dated June 11-2021 along with From No.1 (Distrain Order) under Section 8 of the Revenue Act.

E. Pass such further order or other orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."

3. According to the petitioner, it is a company and is a

premier trading and distribution organization with a network of

offices and subsidiaries spanning more than 29 countries in Africa,

Europe, Middle East, Latin America and Asia and the petitioner is a

member of the reputed business conglomerate the 'Tata Group' and

trades in various minerals, metals, agricultural products in India

and across the globe.

4. Obviously, the impugned action has been initiated in

view of the default committed by respondent No.5 in paying the

amount due to the farmers who supplied sugarcane to respondent

No.5. The case of the petitioner, as advocated by the learned

counsel for the petitioner, is that the petitioner herein purchased

the sugar from respondent No.5 during the period December, 2020

to February, 2021 and the said sugar is lying in the premises of

respondent No.5 and the petitioner alone is the owner of the said

sugar and neither the official respondents nor respondent No.5

have any right over the said sugar. It is the further submission of

the learned counsel that the petitioner herein approached the

District Collector by way of representation dated 11.06.2021,

claiming the sugar covered by the distraint order.

5. On the contrary, strongly resisting the Writ Petition, it is

submitted by the learned Government Pleader for Revenue that the

present Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India, is not maintainable and the only alternative remedy left to

the petitioner is to invoke Section 17 of the Revenue Recovery Act,

1890, by instituting Civil Suit. It is also brought to the notice of

this Court by the learned Government Pleader during the course of

arguments that on the representation dated 11.06.2021 filed by the

petitioner herein, the District Collector, Vizianagaram, vide

proceedings Rc.No.985/202/D3 dated 18.11.2021, passed an order

turning down the request of the petitioner herein. A copy of the said

order is placed on record by the learned Government Pleader and a

copy of the said order is also given to the learned counsel for the

petitioner. It is also brought to the notice of this Court by the

learned Government Pleader that the auction is scheduled to be

held on 23.11.2021.

6. On seeing the above said proceedings dated 18.11.2021,

it is pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that

without considering the points raised in the representation dated

11.06.2021 and without considering the material available on

record, the District Collector, turned down the request of the

petitioner herein. It is also the submission of the learned counsel

for the petitioner that along with the present Writ Petition, a

number of documents such as invoices and unregistered agreement

entered into between the petitioner and respondent No.5 are filed,

which clearly indicate that the petitioner herein is the owner of the

property. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the

petitioner that without holding enquiry, the District Collector

passed the said order. In support of his submissions, learned

counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on the judgment of the

composite High Court in Taherunnisa Begum Vs. District Collector,

Cuddapah District and another1.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in order

to have a quietus for the issue and on perusal of the order of the

District Collector, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the

Writ Petition, leaving it open for the petitioner herein to submit a

detailed explanation by 22.11.2021, enclosing all the relevant

documents in support of its claim for consideration of the same by

the District Collector and for passing appropriate orders in

accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to the

petitioner. It is also made clear that the proposed auction may go

on, but the same shall be deferred till an order is passed by the

District Collector on the explanation to be offered by the petitioner.

In the event of failure on the part of the petitioner in submitting

such an explanation, as indicated above, this order will not enure

to the benefit of the petitioner herein.

8. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall

be no order as to costs of the Writ Petition.

AIR 2008 AP 11

As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in this

Writ Petition shall stand closed.

___________________ A.V.SESHA SAI, J Date: 19.11.2021

Note: Issue cc by tomorrow B/O siva

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI

WRIT PETITION No.21644 OF 2021

Date: 19.11.2021

siva

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter