Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gorapalli Demudu, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh,
2021 Latest Caselaw 4435 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4435 AP
Judgement Date : 2 November, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Gorapalli Demudu, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 2 November, 2021
     THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

                   WRIT PETITION NO.25327 OF 2021

ORDER:

This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India, seeking the following relief:

"to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 3rd Respondent /Tahsildar in not considering the Representation Dt.26.08.2021 for grant of D- Form Patta in the name of petitioner in respect of agricultural land Ac.3.00 cents in Sy.No.63 situated at Ramavaram Village, Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District as illegal, arbitrary besides violative of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the 3rd Respondent/ Tahsildar to consider the Application Dt.26.08.2021 for grant of D-Form Patta and mutate the name of the petitioner as pattadar of the above agricultural land and issue Pattadar Pass Book and Title Deed and to pass such other orders".

2. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the

respondents, during the course of hearing learned counsel for the

petitioner Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, requested this Court without

touching the merits of the case, to issue a direction to the

respondents to dispose of the representation dated 26.08.2021

submitted by the petitioner.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing

for respondents readily agreed to dispose of the representation dated

26.08.2021 submitted by the petitioner, if any pending with the

respondent authorities.

4. In view of the submission of learned Assistant Government

Pleader for Revenue, appearing for respondents, I need not decide the

truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition.

5. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued in view

of the judgment of the Apex Court in The Government of India v.

P.Venkatesh1, wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may

make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened

adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of

justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself requested to

issue a direction to dispose of the representation dated 26.08.2021

submitted by the petitioner, I find no other alternative except to issue

such direction.

6. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of,

directing the 3rd respondent to dispose of the representation dated

26.08.2021 submitted by the petitioner, if any, pending with the

respondent authorities, in accordance with law, within four (04)

weeks from today. No costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall

also stand closed.

_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Date: 02.11.2021

sj

2019 (8) SCALE 544

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

WRIT PETITION NO.25327 OF 2021

Date: 02.11.2021

sj

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter