Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2744 AP
Judgement Date : 30 July, 2021
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE NO.: S.A.No.327 of 2021
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Date ORDER OFFICE
No. NOTE
2 30.07.2021 MVR,J Tr. to I-O
folder
before
S.A.No.327 of 2021 corrections
if any.
Pl.verify.
Heard Sri S.Subba Reddy, learned counsel for the
appellant, M/s.Indus Law Firm for respondents 1 and 2 and
learned Government Pleaders for Appeals and Arbitration
appearing for the respondents 3 to 5.
Upon consideration of the decrees and judgments of the trial Court as well as the 1st appellate Court, since the following substantial questions of law arise for determination in the second appeal, ADMIT.
1. Whether the lower appellate Court framed points for consideration as mandated under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC being the final fact finding Court, if not the judgment and decree of the lower appellate Court is liable to be set aside?
2. Whether the non-consideration of Exs.A2, A3, A11 to A14 would vitiate the judgment of the lower appellate Court?
3. Whether the respondents, having pleaded that the plaint 'B' schedule is joint property proved the same? If not, the judgment of the lower appellate Court is liable to be set aside?
Issue notice to the respondents to submit arguments in respect of above substantial questions of law(Arulmighu Nellukadai Mariamman Tirukkoil v. Tamilarasi(dead) by Lrs. (AIR 2019 SC 3027) followed). List the matter during the last week of October, 2021.
______ MVR,J I.A.No.1 of 2021
At request on behalf of M/s.Indus Law Firm, list on
11.08.2021, for counter.
______ MVR,J Pab
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!