Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2692 AP
Judgement Date : 28 July, 2021
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE NO.: S.A.No.323 of 2021
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Date ORDER OFFICE
No. NOTE
1 28.07.2021 MVR,J Tr. to I-O
folder
before
S.A.No.323 of 2021 corrections
if any.
Pl.verify.
Heard Sri Taddi Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for
the appellant.
Upon consideration of the decrees and judgments of
the trial Court as well as the 1st appellate Court, since the
following substantial questions of law arise for
determination in the second appeal, ADMIT.
1. Whether the Courts below acted legally in
dismissing the suit even though the Ex.A1
document clearly shows that the father of the
plaintiff was appointed as an Administrator to
the plaint schedule property during his lifetime
and also his family members have been in
continuous possession and enjoyment and which
was not disputed by the defendant?
2. Whether the reasoning of the lower appellate
Court in confirming the judgment of the trial
Court is legally sustainable and is based on
proper appreciation of evidence on record?
Issue notice to the respondent to submit arguments in
respect of above substantial questions of law(Arulmighu Nellukadai Mariamman Tirukkoil v. Tamilarasi(dead) by Lrs. (AIR 2019 SC 3027) followed). List the matter during the last week of September, 2021 along with I.A.
______ MVR,J Pab
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!