Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2660 AP
Judgement Date : 27 July, 2021
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE NO.: S.A.No.99 of 2019
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Date ORDER OFFICE
No. NOTE
15. 27.07.2021 MVR,J Tr. to I-O
S.A.No.99 of 2019 folder
before
Heard Sri V.Nitesh, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri correctio
ns if any.
G.Ramachandra Reddy, learned counsel for Sri A.S.S.Reddy,
Pl.verify.
learned counsel for the respondent.
Upon consideration of the decrees and judgments of the trial Court as well as the 1st appellate Court, since the following substantial question of law arises for determination in the second appeal, ADMIT.
"Whether the findings of the Courts below directing the respondent to pay the market value prevalent as in the year 2006 even after declaring the right and title of the appellant and not ordering for redelivery of possession is correct?"
Issue notice to the respondent to submit arguments in respect of above substantial question of law(Arulmighu Nellukadai Mariamman Tirukkoil v. Tamilarasi(dead) by Lrs. (AIR 2019 SC 3027) followed).
List the matter during the third week of October, 2021.
______ MVR,J Pab
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!