Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tulava Venkateswara Rao, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
2021 Latest Caselaw 2647 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2647 AP
Judgement Date : 27 July, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Tulava Venkateswara Rao, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 27 July, 2021
Bench: M.Satyanarayana Murthy
    THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

                           WRIT PETITON NO.14582 of 2021

ORDER:

This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India, seeking the following relief:-

"....to issue a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the highhanded action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioner from his residential plot No.434 admeasuring Ac.0-02½ cents situated in Sy.No.1119 with subsisting house bearing D.No.3-64 (Old No.6/311-4) of K.Boyanapallu Village, Rajampet Mandal, YSR Kadapa District as illegal, arbitrary, violation of the principles of natural justice, violation of Articles 14, 19 and 300(A) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the above mentioned property of the petitioner without following due process of law and pass such other order or orders..."

Though the petitioner made several allegations in the writ

affidavit filed along with the writ petition, the truth or otherwise in

those allegations need not be adjudicated by this Court, in view of

the submission made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader

for Revenue that the respondent authorities will follow due process

of law.

In Rame Gowda (D) By Lrs vs M. Varadappa Naidu (D) By

Lrs. & Anr1, Ram Rattan v. State of Uttar Pradesh2 and Munshi

Ram v. Delhi Administration3, the Supreme Court held as

follows:-

"...to forcibly dispossess citizens of their private property, without following the due process of law, would be to violate a human right, as also the constitutional right under Article 300A of the Constitution."

AIR 2004 SC 4609

1975 AIR 1674 = 1975 SCR 299

1968 AIR 702 = 1968 SCR (2) 408

Recording submission of the learned Assistant Government

for Revenue as there is no proposal to take possession of the

subject land, and in view of the judgments of Apex Court referred

above, the respondents are directed not to take any coercive steps,

except by due process of law.

With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of, at

the stage of admission, with the consent of both the counsel.

However, this order will not preclude the respondents to take

appropriate steps in accordance with law. There shall be no order

as to costs.

As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in

this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Date: 27-07-2021

VSL

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

WRIT PETITON NO.14582 of 2021

Date: 27-07-2021

VSL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter