Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2538 AP
Judgement Date : 22 July, 2021
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE: SECOND APPEAL No.304 of 2021
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Date ORDER OFFICE
No. NOTE
1. 22.7.2021 MVR,J
Second Appeal No.304 of 2021
Heard Sri P.Ganga Rami Reddy, learned
counsel for the appellant. Considering the decrees
and judgments of the trial Court as well as the first
appellate Court since the following substantial
questions of law arise for determination in this
second appeal, Admit:
1. Whether the judgment of the lower appellate
Court is vitiated by not framing the points for
consideration as required by law?
2. Whether in the absence of any pleading, any
issue and evidence, the view expressed by the
lower appellate Court that the suit is not
maintainable and barred by limitation is
clearly unwarranted?
3. Whether the lower appellate Court erred in
saying that the suit filed by the appellant for
partition is maintainable even though there is
no evidence on record to show that the share
of appellant was divided by metes and bounds
and separate possession of such share was
allotted to the appellant?
Issue notice to the respondents to submit
arguments in respect of the above substantial questions of law (Arulmighu Nellukadai Mariamman Tirukkoil vs. Tamilarasi (dead) by LRs., Air 2019 SC 3027 followed).
List during the 1st week of October 2021.
________ MVR,J I.A.No.1 of 2021 Heard.
It is made clear that any transaction in relation to the property concerned to this matter shall be subject to the result in this Second Appeal, and notice.
________ MVR,J vasu
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!