Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2268 AP
Judgement Date : 5 July, 2021
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU
WRIT PETITION No.9623 of 2021
ORDER:
Fresh proof of service vide USR No.31340 of 2021 is
filed showing that the notice served on the 5th respondent.
There is no representation for the 5th respondent. The office
of Sri Raviteja Padari, the learned Standing Counsel is
represented by Sri Yaswanth. He again reiterates that
respondent Nos.3 and 4 are not objecting to the petitioner's
discharge of duties. Respondent No.5 did not appear despite
notice.
In view of the clear and categorical submissions by the
main answering respondents namely respondent Nos.3 and 4
that they are not interfering in the petitioner's discharge of
duties, this Court is of the opinion that further survives for
adjudication. The submission of Sri Yaswanth representing
Sri Raviteja Padari is noted and the writ petition is disposed
of noting the said submission. Therefore, in line with the
Judgment in W.P.No.441 of 2021, there shall be a direction to
the respondents to allow the petitioner to discharge her duties
till her services are terminated in accordance with the
applicable circulars, regulations etc.
With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any,
in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.
__________________________ D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU, J Date: 05.07.2021 Sj
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU
WRIT PETITION No.9623 of 2021
05.07.2021
sj
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!