Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bollina Sivarama Krishna vs The State Of Ap
2021 Latest Caselaw 2237 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2237 AP
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Bollina Sivarama Krishna vs The State Of Ap on 1 July, 2021
     THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

                  WRIT PETITION No.10270 OF 2021

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution

of India, seeking the following relief:

".....to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declare the action of the respondents 2 to 5 not to cancel Pattadar Pass Book and Title Deed stood in the name of the petitioner and not to mutate and incorporating the names of any third parties in the landed property situated in Puppalavarigudem Gram Panchayat, Puppalavarigudem Village, Lingapalem Mandal, covered by R.S.No.15/1 in an extent of Ac. 3.58 cents without any inquiry contemplated in the Pattadar Pass Books Act and consequently to direct the respondent authorities to consider the representation, dated 16.03.2021 made by the petitioner...."

2. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the

respondents, during the course of hearing learned counsel for the

petitioner requested this Court without touching the merits of the

case, to issue a direction to the respondents to dispose of the

representation dated 16.03.2021 submitted by the petitioner.

3. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for

respondents readily agreed to dispose of the representation dated

16.03.2021 submitted by the petitioner, if any pending with the

respondent authorities.

4. In view of the submission of Government Pleader for Revenue

appearing for respondents, I need not decide the truth or otherwise of

the allegations made in the petition.

5. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued in view

of the judgment of the Apex Court in The Government of India v.

P.Venkatesh1, wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may

make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened

adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of

justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself requested to

issue a direction to dispose of the representation dated 16.03.2021

submitted by the petitioner, I find no other alternative except to issue

such direction.

6. In the result, Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the

respondent authorities to dispose of representation dated 16.03.2021

submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law, within four (04)

weeks from today. No costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall

also stand closed.

_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Date: 01.07.2021

KK

2019 (8) SCALE 544

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

WRIT PETITION NO.10270 OF 2021

Date: 30.06.2021

KK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter