Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Satyanarayana Kondisetty vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh,
2021 Latest Caselaw 69 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 69 AP
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Satyanarayana Kondisetty vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 7 January, 2021
Bench: M.Satyanarayana Murthy
       THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

                         WRIT PETITION NO.689 OF 2021
ORDER:

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution

of India seeking the following relief:

"to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not releasing the vehicle of the petitioner i.e. Bolero bearing No.AP 05 TU 5092 (Engine No GA91B11512 and Chassis No.MA1RZ2GAA91B15353) which is in the custody of 3rd respondent despite petition by the petitioner, dt 05.12.2020 for its Interim Custody as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Provisions of AP Excise Act, 1968 and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to give Interim Custody of the vehicle to the petitioner."

Though the petitioner made several allegations against the

respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner

requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to

issue a direction to the respondents to dispose of the

representation/application of the petitioner dated 05.12.2020.

Learned Government Pleader for Home readily agreed to

dispose of the application of the petitioner dated 05.12.2020, if any

pending with the authorities.

In view of the submission of the learned Government Pleader

for Home, I need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations

made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction

be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in "The

Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1", wherein the Apex Court

held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases

in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do no service to

the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself

requested to issue a direction to dispose of the application/

2019 (8) SCALE 544 MSM,J WP_689_2021

representation dated 05.12.2020, I find no other alternative except to

issue such direction.

In the result, the writ petition is disposed of, directing

respondent Nos.2 and 3 to dispose of the application/representation

of the petitioner dated 05.12.2020, in accordance with law, within

one (1) week from today. No costs.

The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand

closed.

_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY 07.01.2021 Ksp

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter