Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

T Venkatappala Naidu vs State Of Ap
2021 Latest Caselaw 401 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 401 AP
Judgement Date : 28 January, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
T Venkatappala Naidu vs State Of Ap on 28 January, 2021
Bench: M.Satyanarayana Murthy
     THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

                   WRIT PETITION No.21619 of 2020
ORDER:

This writ petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

"....issue a Writ, Order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the G.O.Ms.No.71, dt.25.01.2019 in so far as it deprives the Petitioner's seniority in the category of Prohibition & Excise Inspector as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and further declare that the Petitioner is entitled to count his seniority in the category of Prohibition & Excise Inspector from the date of his promotion i.e., 11.07.2008 and pass such other order or orders...."

2. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the

respondents, during hearing, Sri Seepani S.Kumar, learned counsel for the

petitioner, requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case,

to issue a direction to the respondents to dispose of the representations,

dated 01.10.2020 and 05.10.2020, submitted by the petitioner.

3. Learned Government Pleader for Services I appearing for the

respondents readily agreed to dispose of the petitioner's representations,

dated 01.10.2020 and 05.10.2020, if any, pending with the respondent

authorities.

4. In view of the submission of learned Government Pleader for

Services I appearing for the respondents, I need not decide the truth or

otherwise of the allegations made in the writ petition. This Court is

conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the

Apex Court in The Government of India vs. P.Venkatesh1, wherein

the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy

disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do

no service to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the

2019(8) SCALE 544 2 MSM,J W.P.No.21619 of 2020

petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the

representations, dated 01.10.2020 and 05.10.2020, submitted by the

petitioner, I find no other alternative except to issue such direction.

5. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the

respondents to dispose of the representations, dated 01.10.2020 and

05.10.2020, submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a

period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications shall stand

closed.

                                           _____________________________
                                           M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
28th January, 2021
GHN
 3                 MSM,J
    W.P.No.21619 of 2020
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter