Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pinnu Jayarami Reddy vs The Special Deputy Collector,
2021 Latest Caselaw 328 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 328 AP
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Pinnu Jayarami Reddy vs The Special Deputy Collector, on 22 January, 2021
Bench: Ninala Jayasurya
                                      1



          HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

                  WRIT PETITION No.22765 of 2020


ORDER: (Heard and pronounced through Blue Jeans App (Virtual) mode, since
this mode is adopted on account of prevalence of COVID-19 pandemic)

       Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant

Government Pleader for Land Acquisition. With their consent, the writ

petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission.


       The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ petition is that

the respondents have not taken any steps to deposit/pay the enhanced

compensation amounts in respect of the trees in the lands acquired from

the petitioners and that the same is illegal, void, arbitrary, unconstitutional

and violative of rights of the petitioners guaranteed under Articles 14, 21

and 300-A of Constitution of India and therefore seek a direction to the

respondents to deposit/pay the compensation to the petitioners. The

petitioners' lands in different extents as mentioned in the affidavit filed in

support of the writ petition were acquired for the construction of Kandaleru

Reservoir under Telugu Ganga Project pursuant to notification dated

31.07.1990 issued by respondents. The Land Acquisition Officer passed an

Award on 20.01.1992 and on a reference in L.A.O.P.No.33 of 1992, a

judgment was passed on 25.06.2002 enhancing the compensation. Against

the same, the petitioners preferred an appeal to the Hon'ble Common High

Court at Hyderabad in A.S.No.526 of 2004 and the compensation was

further enhanced vide judgment dated 04.10.2017. The State, against the

said judgment has not carried the matter by way of appeal to the Hon'ble

Supreme Court. Thus the quantum of compensation payable to the

petitioners has attained finality. Despite the said position, the compensation

has not been deposited to the petitioners till today.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondents

even after lapse of more than three years failed to deposit/pay

compensation to the petitioners which has attained finality by virtue of the

order of Hon'ble Division Bench referred to above. He states that the

petitioners are discriminated in as much as some of the claimants whose

lands/trees were acquired along with the petitioners' lands have been paid

compensation, however due to reasons not known to the petitioners, they

were not paid compensation so far. The learned counsel states that due to

discrimination as well as non payment of the compensation, the petitioners

are seriously prejudiced and under those circumstances, the petitioners are

constrained to approach this Court.

The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition on

instructions submits that the proposals for payment of compensation are in

process, but the same would take some considerable time to finalise the

same. Accordingly, he seeks Four months time for making/depositing the

amounts towards the compensation.

Considered the submissions made by both the parties. This is a

matter where the petitioners' lands along with trees were acquired in the

year 1990 and the compensation has not been paid even after the matter

has attained finality in the year 2017 by virtue of the orders passed by the

Hon'ble Division Bench in A.S.No.526 of 2004 dated 04.10.2017. The

petitioners are entitled for the lawful compensation as determined by the

Courts of Law and they cannot be deprived of fruits of the order due to

undue delays. In the present case, the dispute with regard to

determination of compensation remained unchallenged and thus attained

finality. In such circumstances, the respondents have no other alternative,

except to deposit/pay the compensation due and payable to the petitioners.

Though this Court is not inclined to go into the aspects of the

discrimination, however finds justification in the submissions made by the

learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are deprived of

enjoying the fruits of the orders passed in their favour due to delay on the

part of the respondents. Under the said circumstances, the respondents are

directed to deposit/pay the compensation in respect of the trees in the

lands acquired from the petitioners, within a period of four (4) weeks from

the date of receipt of copy of the order.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order

as to costs.

As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall

stand closed.

______________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J

Date: 22.01.2021.

BLV

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

WRIT PETITION No.22765 of 2020 Dt:22.01.2021

BLV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter