Thursday, 30, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K. Sadasiva, vs The State Of A.P.
2021 Latest Caselaw 132 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 132 AP
Judgement Date : 18 January, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
K. Sadasiva, vs The State Of A.P. on 18 January, 2021
Bench: M.Satyanarayana Murthy
       THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

                         WRIT PETITION NO.1145 OF 2021
ORDER:

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution

of India seeking the following relief:

"to issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction by declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not considering and passing orders on the representation dated 14.05.2020 made by the petitioner for promotion to the post of Superintendent as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on the representation dated 14.05.2020 submitted by the petitioner by promoting him as Superintendent."

Though the petitioner made several allegations against the

respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner

requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to

issue a direction to the respondents to dispose of the representation

of the petitioner dated 14.05.2020.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-III readily

agreed to dispose of the representations of the petitioner dated

14.05.2020, if any pending with the authorities.

In view of the submission of the learned Assistant Government

Pleader for Services-III, I need not decide the truth or otherwise of

the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no

such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court

in "The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1", wherein the Apex

Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of

cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do no

service to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the

petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to the respondents

2019 (8) SCALE 544 MSM,J WP_1145_2021

to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 14.05.2020, I

find no other alternative except to issue such direction.

In the result, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the

respondents to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated

14.05.2020, in accordance with law, within four (04) weeks from

today. No costs.

Consequently miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall

also stand closed.

_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Date: 18.01.2021

SP

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter