Thursday, 30, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

N.Murali Mohan Reddy vs State Of Ap
2021 Latest Caselaw 760 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 760 AP
Judgement Date : 11 February, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
N.Murali Mohan Reddy vs State Of Ap on 11 February, 2021
Bench: M.Ganga Rao
           THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO

                 WRIT PETITION No.9135 OF 2019
ORDER:-

      This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India, seeking the following relief:


      ".....to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly
      one in the nature of Writ of mandamus, declaring the
      action of the 4th Respondent in refusing to register the

subject land under Refusal order passed by the Respondent No.4 vide document of the petitioner reason for refusal for P.No.4 of 2017 and refusal order No.54 of 2017, dated 07.08.2017 is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to G.O.Ms.No.575, dated 16.11.2018. Consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 to receive the said document, register and release the same in favour of the petitioner".

2. Heard, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Assistant

Government Pleader for Registration and Stamps for Respondents.

3. The Case of the petitioner is that he purchased the land to

an extent of Ac. 2.87 cents, out of Ac. 5.87 cents in Sy.No. 84/1A

of Kirikera Village, Polam of Hindupur Mandal from S. Thimma

Reddy and others represented by G.P.A Holder G.Rupa W/o M.

Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy. Originally the land was assigned to

Thimmaiah vide D.A.R.Dis.No.283/39, dated 20.09.1931 and 2nd

respondent had issued No Objection Certificate for the land to an

extent of Ac. 4.18 cents, situated in Sy.no. 83/1B, which is also

assigned with subject land Sy.No.84/1A. On earlier occasion, the

said G. Rupa, being G.P.A Holder has filed W.P.No.3546 of 2017

before the erstwhile High Court of A.P, Hyderabad in respect of the

land to an extent of Ac. 5.87 cents situated in Sy.No. 84/1A,

wherein this Court observed that, having received the document

presented by the petitioner before the Sub-Registrar, Hindupur,

under obligation to register the same and the same is in order and

does not fall within the prohibited list under Section 22-A of the

Registration Act. In case, if he intends to reject the same and pass

an order. The said G.Rupa, being G.P.A Holder has executed

several sale deeds in favour of various third parties in respect of

the remaining lands, situated in Sy.No. 84/1A. As a sequel, the

said G.Rupa, being the G.P.A Holder has executed the Sale Deed

on 07.08.2017 in favour of petitioner and presented before the 4th

respondent for registration in respect of the subject land, which is

assigned to P.No.133 of 2017 and passed refusal order No. 57 of

2017, dated 07.08.2017. The petitioner has made application

before the 3rd respondent against the impugned order dated

07.08.2017, so far no response from their end, which is illegal and

arbitrary. Assailing arbitrary and inaction of the respondents, this

Writ Petition is filed.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner drawn further attention of

this Court to the similar judgment of this Court in Sri Bhogala

Malakonda Reddy and others v. Sate of Andhra Pradesh, rep.

by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Amaravati1,

in similar circumstances and requested to issue a direction as

stated above. The learned Assistant Government Pleader requested

to pass appropriate orders for implementation of the

recommendation made by the 2nd respondent to the 3rd

respondent.

5. Following the said order, the respondents are directed to

complete the process of deletion of the petitioner's land to an

extent of Ac. 2.87 cents, out of Ac. 5.87 cents, situated in Sy.No.

84/1A of Kirikera Village Polam, Hindupur Mandal, from the

prohibited property list, within four (04) weeks from the date of

W.P.No.10920 of 2019 dated 22.06.2020

receipt of a copy of this order, in terms of G.O.Ms.No.575 dated

16.11.2018 and communicate the deletion order to the

respondents 3 and 4 immediately. On such deletion, the 4th

respondent is directed to receive the proposed Sale Deed presented

by the petitioner, register it, if it is otherwise in order and release

the same in accordance with law.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to

costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any,

shall also stand closed.

_________________________ JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO Date: 03.02.2021

KK

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO

WRIT PETITION No.9135 OF 2019

Date: 11.02.2021

KK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter