Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 475 AP
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2021
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION NO.2252 OF 2021
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India seeking the following relief:-
"....to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not promoting the petitioner to the post of Junior Assistant, though the petitioner is fully qualified and eligible for promotion as Junior Assistant from April, 2014, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to promote the petitioner to the post of Junior Assistant from the date of eligibility of promotion as Junior Assistant i.e., April, 2014 and pay all consequential benefits and pay arrears from the date of Assistant by considering the representation and pass such other order."
2. Though the petitioners made several allegations against the
respondents, during hearing, Sri Aravala Rama Rao, learned counsel
for the petitioner limited his request to dispose of the representation
made by the petitioner on 14.11.2014, without touching the merits of
the case.
3. Learned Government Pleader for Services-III appearing for
respondents readily agreed to dispose of the representation dated
14.11.2014 submitted by the petitioner, if any, pending with the
respondent-authorities.
4. In view of the learned Government Pleader for Services-III,
I need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made in
the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be
issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in "The
Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1", wherein the Apex Court
held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases
in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not service to
the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself
requested to issue a direction to dispose of the representation dated
14.11.2014 submitted by the petitioner, I find no other alternative,
except to issue such direction.
5. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the
respondent authorities to dispose of the representation submitted by
the petitioner dated 14.11.2014, in accordance with law, within four
(04) weeks from today. No costs.
As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall
also stand closed.
__________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Date: 01.02.2021
IS
2019 (8) SCALE 544
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION NO.2252 OF 2021
Date: 01.02.2021
IS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!