Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt.Nadendla Praveena vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep. By ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 5538 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5538 AP
Judgement Date : 28 December, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Smt.Nadendla Praveena vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep. By ... on 28 December, 2021
Bench: M.Satyanarayana Murthy
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

                         WRIT PETITION NO.2192 OF 2015

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India seeking the following relief:

""to issue Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents in not taking any action on the representation of the Petitioner for allotment of land in Sy.No.88 an extent of Ac.2-50 Cts of Gollanapalli Village, Gannavaram Mandal, Krishna Dist as illegal arbitrary and against the law and consequently direct the Respondents to consider the representations dated 31.08.2013 and 02.05.2013 of the Petitioner for assignment of Ac.2-50 Cs In Sy.No.88 of GollanapalliV Gannavaram M Krishna District."

Though the petitioner made several allegations against the

respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner

requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to

issue a direction to the respondents to dispose of the

representations of the petitioner dated 31.08.2013 and 02.05.2013

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue readily

agreed to dispose of the representations of the petitioner dated

31.08.2013 and 02.05.2013, if any pending with the authorities.

In view of the submission of the learned Assistant

Government Pleader for Revenue, I need not decide the truth or

otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is

conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment

of the Apex Court in "The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1",

wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick

or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions.

2019 (8) SCALE 544

But, they do no service to the cause of justice. As the learned

counsel for the petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to

dispose of the representations of the petitioners dated 31.08.2013

and 02.05.2013, I find no other alternative except to issue such

direction.

In the result, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the

respondents to dispose of the representations dated 31.08.2013

and 02.05.2013 within four (04) weeks from today. No costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any,

shall stand closed.

_____________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Date: 278.12.2021

SP

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter