Thursday, 30, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Telukutla Gopala Venkata Krishna ... vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
2021 Latest Caselaw 4941 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4941 AP
Judgement Date : 2 December, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Telukutla Gopala Venkata Krishna ... vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 2 December, 2021
 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

                  I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2021
                          In/and
            CRIMINAL PETITION No.5256 OF 2021
ORDER :

This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short "Cr.P.C.") is filed seeking

quash of the proceedings in S.C.No.195/S/2018 in Crime No281

of 2017, dated 10.11.2017 on the file of Special Court for SC, ST

(POA) Act Cases at Guntur-cum-IV Additional District & Sessions

Judge, Guntur District.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the 2nd

respondent- de facto complainant.

3. The petitioner is the sole accused in the above S.C.

No.195/S/2018 on the file of Special Court for SC, ST (POA) Act

Cases at Guntur-cum-IV Additional District & Sessions Judge,

Guntur District. He is facing prosecution for the offence

punishable under Sections 354 (a), 354(D)(i), 506 IPC and Section

3(1)(w)(ii) of SC, ST (POA) Act. After charge sheet is filed in the

trial Court, the present criminal petition under Section 482

Cr.P.C is filed seeking quash of the said proceedings. When the

criminal petition came up for hearing before this Court, the

petitioner has filed I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2021 seeking permission to

compound the said offences on the ground that both the de facto

complainant and the petitioner have entered into compromise in

the said case and that the de facto complainant has no objection

to acquit the petitioner/accused in the said crime.

4. Pursuant to the direction of this Court, both de facto

complainant and the petitioner, who is accused in the said case,

are present before the Court today. They are identified by the

Sub-Inspector of Police of Nagarampalem Police Station, who is

present before the Court today.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel

for the 2nd respondent have also identified the de facto

complainant and the accused.

6. When the de facto complainant is questioned, she has

uninvocably stated that she entered into compromise with the

accused willingly as per her free consent and that there was no

compulsion on her to enter into such compromise.

7. The offences which are registered against the petitioner

are non-compoundable offences. They are not compoundable

either with the permission of the Court or without permission of

the Court as contemplated under Section 320(1) and (2) of Cr.P.C.

However, the Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh v. State of

Punjab1 held that even when the offences are non-compoundable,

when the parties have entered into a compromise, except in

certain offences like murder, rape, dacoity and offences arising

out of special statutes like Prevention of Corruption Act or

offences committed by public servants in their official capacity,

the other offences in criminal cases can be allowed to be

compromised despite the fact that they are non-compoundable

under Section 320 of Cr.P.C and this Court can quash the

proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

(2012) 10 SCC 303 = AIR 2012 S.C. 838

8. Therefore, considering the dictum laid down in the

aforesaid judgment, even though the offences registered against

the petitioner are non-compoundable offences, having regard to

the fact that both parties have entered into a compromise, as

continuation of proceedings amount to abuse of process of Court,

the same can be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., in

exercising inherent powers of this Court and order for acquittal of

the accused.

9. Therefore, I.A.Nos. 3 and 4 of 2021 which are filed

seeking permission to compound the offence and to record

compromise between the parties are allowed. Consequently, the

Criminal Petition No.5256 of 2021 is allowed, in view of the

compromise entered into by both the parties, quashing all further

proceedings in S.C. No.195/S/2018 on the file of Special Court

for SC, ST (POA) Act Cases at Guntur-cum-IV Additional District

& Sessions Judge, Guntur District.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand

disposed of.

________________________________________ CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J

Date : 02-12-2021

Gvl

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2021 In/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.5256 OF 2021

Date : 02-12-2021

Gvl

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter