Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4923 AP
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2021
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE NO. SECOND APPEAL No.555 of 2021
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Date ORDER OFFICE
No. NOTE
02 01.12.2021 MVR,J
S.A.No.555 of 2021
Heard Sri I.Venkata Prasad, learned counsel for
the appellants. ADMIT.
The following are the substantial questions of
law.
1. When the findings of Courts below ignoring the
legal evidence available in the case and ignoring
the inferences to be drawn from the
circumstances established can be described as
perverse and in which case whether such a
finding is binding on second appellate Court under
Section 100 CPC?
2. Whether the lower appellate Court is right in
confirming the judgment of the trial Court
without framing the significant points for
determination, which are crucial for elucidating
the prominent controversy in the instant case
basing on the pleading of both parties as
enshrined by the proviso Order-41, Rule-31 CPC?
3. Whether the Courts below can be justified in
declaring that ABCDEF rastha is 30 feet length
north-south and 8 feet width east-west without
seeking the declaration of his right over the
alleged ABCDEF rastha by the plaintiff?
Notice to respondents.
List during 1st week of February, 2022.
_____ MVR,J
I.A.No.1 of 2021
Heard. Interim stay of operation of the decree in O.S.No.127 of 2010 dated 29.06.2018 on the file of the Court of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Gooty, Ananthapuramu District confirmed in A.S.No.30 of 2018 by the decree dated 29.06.2021 on the file of the Court contd...
of the learned VI Additional District Judge, Ananthapuramu at Gooty, until further orders and notice.
_____ MVR,J RR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!