Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2878 AP
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2021
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE: SECOND APPEAL No.370 of 2021
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Date ORDER OFFICE
No. NOTE
1. 04.8.2021 MVR,J
Second Appeal No.370 of 2021
Heard Sri T.N.M. Ranga Rao, learned counsel
for the appellant. Considering the decrees and
judgments of the trial Court as well as the first
appellate Court since the following substantial
questions of law arise for determination in this
second appeal, Admit:
1. Whether the appellate Court followed the
procedure without making any application by
either parties and without giving notice or
opportunity to parties, framed the Additional
Issues and dismissed the appeal instead of
remitted back the matter to the original court,
is justified under Order XLI Rule 31 of CPC or
not?
2. Whether the Courts below have dismissed the
suit and confirmed the appeal by misreading
documentary evidence and ignoring the oral
evidence in the light of the judgments reported
in 2017 (3) ALD 100 (SC) and 2015 (4) ALD
135 (SC), is justified or not?
3. Whether both the Courts have not taken into
the source of title and ownership and conduct
of the defendants as per Section 52 and 104 of
Evidence Act, is justified or not?
Issue notice to the respondents to submit
arguments in respect of the above substantial questions of law (Arulmighu Nellukadai Mariamman Tirukkoil vs. Tamilarasi (dead) by LRs., Air 2019 SC 3027 followed).
List during the 3rd week of November 2021.
________ MVR,J vasu
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!