Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2776 AP
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2021
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE: SECOND APPEAL No.339 of 2021
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Date ORDER OFFICE
No. NOTE
1. 02.8.2021 MVR,J
Second Appeal No.339 of 2021
Heard Sri Harish Kumar Rasineni, learned
counsel for the appellants. Considering the decrees
and judgments of the trial Court as well as the first
appellate Court since the following substantial
questions of law arise for determination in this
second appeal, Admit:
1. Whether the Courts below have correctly applied
the principle of burden of proof and shifting the
onus while deciding the question whether the suit
property was a joint family property or a self-
acquired property of defendant No.1 when it is
admitted case of the defendant No.2 that the suit
schedule property is joint family property as per
Ex.A.4 partition deed dated 16.5.2008?
2. Whether the registered partition deed dated
16.5.2008 between the father and son (defendant
Nos. 1 and 2) is legal and binding on the daughters
who are plaintiffs and defendant No.3 in view of the
Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005?
3. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case
and in view of Section 6 of the Hindu Succession
(Amendment) Act, 2005, the appellants/plaintiffs
attained the status of coparcener in their own right
in the same manner as their brother/defendant
No.2 in respect of the suit schedule properties?
Issue notice to the respondents to submit
arguments in respect of the above substantial questions of law (Arulmighu Nellukadai Mariamman Tirukkoil vs. Tamilarasi (dead) by LRs., Air 2019 SC 3027 followed).
List during the last week of October 2021.
________ MVR,J I.A.No.1 of 2021 To list along with the Second Appeal.
________ MVR,J vasu
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!