Aman Alias Virendra vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
2025 Latest Caselaw 327 ALL

Allahabad High Court

Aman Alias Virendra vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 1 May, 2025

Author: Siddharth

Bench: Siddharth

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 


?Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:69260
 
Court No. - 47
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28735 of 2024
 

 
Applicant :- Aman Alias Virendra
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Arun Kumar Tiwari
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
 

Heard Shri Avanish Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State.

This is the second bail application. The first bail application was rejected by this Bench vide order dated 15.12.2023.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that before the trial court six out of 14 prosecution witnesses have only been examined. The statement of the victim has already been recorded. There is no possibility of early conclusion of trial.The applicant is in jail since 29.5.2023 and has no criminal history to his credit.

On the other hand learned A.G.A has opposed the prayer for bail.

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties noted above, finding force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, recent judgment dated 11.07.2022 of the Apex Court in the case of Manish Sisodia vs. Directorate of Enforcement, 2024 LawSuit (SC) 677. and considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by the under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

Let the applicant,Aman Alias Virendra , involved in Case Crime No. 115 of 2023 (Session Case No. 1215 of 2023) , under Section-452,376(3) IPC, and 3/4 (2) POCSO Act Police Station- Sadh, District- Kanpur Nagar, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.

(ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

(iii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

(iv) In case the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

(v) The applicant shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

Order Date :- 1.5.2025

Atul kr. sri.