Ranisha Devi vs State Of U.P. And Another
2025 Latest Caselaw 4785 ALL

Allahabad High Court

Ranisha Devi vs State Of U.P. And Another on 7 February, 2025

Author: Sanjay Kumar Pachori

Bench: Sanjay Kumar Pachori

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 


?Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:17855
 
Court No. - 75
 

 
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37462 of 2024
 

 
Applicant :- Ranisha Devi
 
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Zeeshan,Vishveshwar Mani Tripathi
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
 

Sri Vishveshwar Mani Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri R.K.Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

The present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 9958 of 2024, (State Vs. Ranisha Devi), arising out of Case Crime No. 452 of 2019, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 308 of I.P.C., Police Station- Rampur Karkhana, District Deoria as well as cognizance/ summoning order 26.07.2024, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 17, Deoria.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant was not arrested during the course of investigation and the charge-sheet has been submitted against him. It is further submitted that the offence is punishable up to 7 years imprisonment.

Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant is, hereby, refused.

After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw the application with liberty to file a regular bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction.

In case bail application is filed by the learned counsel for the applicants, the same shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2022) 10 SCC 51, wherein the Supreme Court considering the category(A) as mentioned in the paragraph no. 2, bail applications of such accused against which charge-sheet has been submitted on appearance may be decided without the accused being taken in physical custody or by granting interim bail till the bail application is decided. It has been observed that at the cost of repetition, we wish to state that, in category A, one would except a better exercise of discretion on the part of the court in favour of the accused.

The application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

Order Date :- 7.2.2025

MAA/-