Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 21686 ALL
Judgement Date : 2 July, 2024
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:107224-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 139 of 2019 Appellant :- Yogendra Kumar Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Ramesh Chandra Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Raj Mohan Yadav Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
1. List has been revised. None appears to press the appeal.
2. It appears that either the cause of action no more survives or appellant has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits. After perusing the impugned judgment and order, we notice that the same has been rendered by the learned Single Judge with cogent and justifiable reasons. In an Intra-Court Special Appeal, no interference is usually warranted unless palpable infirmities or perversities are noticed on a plain reading of the impugned judgment and order. In the facts and circumstances of the instant case, on a plain reading of the impugned judgment and order, we do not notice any such palpable infirmity or perversity. As such, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order.
3. In view of above, the special appeal sans merit and is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 2.7.2024
A.K.Srivastava
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!