Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hari Shyam Yadav vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 29408 ALL

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 29408 ALL
Judgement Date : 19 October, 2023

Allahabad High Court
Hari Shyam Yadav vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ... on 19 October, 2023
Bench: Saurabh Lavania




HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 


?Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:68912
 
Court No. - 18
 
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5411 of 2023
 
Petitioner :- Hari Shyam Yadav
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And 5 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Niyaj Ahmad
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rajendra Nath
 

 
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondents is hereby dispensed with.

By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought the following main relief:-

"(i). issue a direction to the opposite party No. 2, i.e. Sub-Divisional Officer, Tanda, Ambedkar Nagar to decide the Case No. T202304040302567 "Hari Shyam Versus Radhey Shyam & others", under section 144 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006, pending in the court of Sub- Divisional Officer, Tanda, District- Ambedkar Nagar expeditiously within stipulated period as early as possible, pending since 11.10.2022."

The present petition has been filed for expeditious disposal of pendingCase No. T202304040302567 (Hari Shyam Versus Radhey Shyam & others), and cases of such nature as per para 458(1) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, should be decided preferably within a period of one year and accordingly the petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to decide the suit, in issue, at an early stage of proceedings. As such, the present petition for the main relief sought, at this stage, is not liable to be entertained. In this regard, reference can be made to the judgments passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the cases of Km. Shobha Bose v. Judge Small Causes & Ors., 2011 (88) ALR 850 and Ali Shad Usmani & Ors. v. Ali Isteba & Ors. 2015 (109) ALR 513.

After considering the case of the petitioner in the light of the parameters laid down by this Court in the cases of Km. Shobha Bose (Supra) and Ali Shad Usmani (supra) and also para 458(1) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, this Court is of the view that no direction, at this stage, can be issued to the court concerned to decide the above mentioned suit within the certain time frame.

In view of above, the relief, as prayed for in this petition, cannot be granted at this stage. As such, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application for expediting the proceedings of the pending case before the court concerned and in case, such an application is moved, then the court concerned shall pass appropriate orders on the same within reasonable time in accordance with law.

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority/Court concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.

Order Date :- 19.10.2023

Jyoti/-

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter