Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tanveer Khan And 6 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another
2023 Latest Caselaw 29037 ALL

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 29037 ALL
Judgement Date : 17 October, 2023

Allahabad High Court
Tanveer Khan And 6 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 17 October, 2023
Bench: Arun Kumar Deshwal




HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 


?Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:200787
 
Court No. - 93
 

 
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 33429 of 2023
 

 
Applicant :- Tanveer Khan And 6 Others
 
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Sharad Srivastava
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Dharmendra Kumar,Shahbaz Ahamad Khan
 

 
Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.

Heard Sri Sharad Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State.

The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the order dated 19.8.2023 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/II FTC, Ghazipur in Criminal Revision No. 130 of 2022 (Tanveer Khan and others v. State of U.P. and another) and summoning order dated 3.6.2022 in complaint case No. 12463 of 2021 (Rukhsar Khan vs. Tanveer Khan), u/s 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Jamania, District Ghazipur, pending before A.C.J.M., Ghazipur.

A preliminary objection has been raised by learned A.G.A. as per order of the Apex Court passed in the case of Radhey Shyam Vs. State of U.P. reported in (2015) 5 SCC 423, wherein it is observed that all the judicial orders will be challenged under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

This Court is of the view that Hon'ble Apex Court clearly observed in the aforesaid judgment that all the judicial orders will be challenged in the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, therefore, judicial orders should normally be challenged under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Prabhu Chawla Vs. State of Rajasthan and another, (2015) 17 SCC (562) observed that alternative remedy is not a bar to exercise jurisdiction u/s 482 Cr.P.C. in exceptional case. Therefore, in exceptional case application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. may be entertained against judicial order in the interest of justice.

In the present case, the applicants could not make out the case of exceptional nature, which could persuade this Court to exercise its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

In view of the above legal position, applicants are permitted to file Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for challenging the impugned judicial order(s).

With the aforesaid observation, the present application is dismissed.

Certified copy of the impugned order, if any, may be returned to learned counsel for the applicants after retaining xerox copy of the same.

Order Date :- 17.10.2023

Vandana

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter