Allahabad High Court
X ( Minor ) vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 4 August, 2023
Bench: Subhash Chandra Sharma
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:157497
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 262 of 2022
Revisionist :- X ( Minor )
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Revisionist :- Hari Prakash Singh,Md Zakir Husain,Nuruddin Khan
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The present criminal revision has been preferred by the revisionist through his father with a prayer to allow this revision and set aside the judgment and order dated 18.12.2021 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge/ Special Judge POCSO Act (Ananya), Jaunpur in Criminal Appeal No. 68 of 2021 as well as order dated 30.10.2021 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Jaunpur. Further prayed to release the revisionist on bail in Case Crime No. 327 of 2021 under Section 376, 506, 504 I.P.C., 5/6 POCSO Act, Section 3(2)V S.C./ S.T. Act, Police Station Buxa, District Jaunpur.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the revisionist that in this case the delinquent was aged about 17 years 6 months. As per allegation in F.I.R. rape was committed with the victim aged about 12 years but during medical examination no any injury was found on her person to suggest that rape was committed with her. The injury shown was old and healed though medical was conducted promptly just after the incident. There is no any other material on record to show the complicity of the delinquent and the incident of rape with the victim. It is further submitted that there is nothing adverse against the interest of the delinquent in the report submitted by D.P.O.
It is further submitted that the provisions as contained u/s 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act had not been considered by the Juvenile Justice Board even the report submitted by Probation Officer was also not considered. The appellate court has also not considered all these facts but rejected the appeal without applying its judicial mind and considering the law as contained u/s 12 of the aforesaid Act. He is in Child Care Home since 03.10.2021 i.e. more than two years and his psychology is being affected adversely, therefore, requested to set aside orders passed by the J.J. Board as well as appellate court and allow the criminal revision.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer as aforesaid.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submission made by learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A. for the State, the time delinquent remained in Child Care Home, perusal of record, the provisions as contained u/s 12 of Juvenile Justice Act, the report submitted by the Probation Officer, it appears that Juvenile Justice Board as well as the appellate court had not considered the relevant provisions and the material on record in well manner but passed the orders without applying their judicial mind. In this way, there appears ground in this revision and the orders passed by the Juvenile Justice Board as well as learned appellate court are liable to be set aside.
Accordingly, the orders passed by Juvenile Justice Board dated 30.10.2021 and the appellate court dated 18.12.2021 are, hereby, set aside and present criminal revision is hereby, allowed.
It is directed that delinquent/applicant be released on bail on executing person bond by the revisionist ( father of the delinquent) and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board concerned on following conditions :-
(i) The revisionist/ father will furnish an undertaking that upon release on bail the revisionist will not be permitted to go into contact or association with any known criminal or allowed to be exposed to any moral, physical, or psychological danger and further that thefather will ensure that the juvenile will not repeat the offence.
(ii) The revisionist/ father will further furnish an undertaking to the effect that the juvenile will pursue his study at the appropriate level which he would be encouraged to do besides other constructive activities and not be allowed to waste his time in unproductive and excessive recreational pursuits.
(iii) Juvenile and the revisionist/ father will report to the Probation Officer on the first Monday of every calendar month.
(iv) The Probation Officer will keep a strict vigil on the activities of the juvenile and regularly draw up his social investigation report that would be submitted to the Juvenile Justice Board concerned on such a periodical basis as the Juvenile Justice Board may determine.
Order Date :- 4.8.2023
Suraj Srivastav
