Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M. Bhaskaran vs State Of U.P. And Another
2022 Latest Caselaw 4268 ALL

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4268 ALL
Judgement Date : 26 May, 2022

Allahabad High Court
M. Bhaskaran vs State Of U.P. And Another on 26 May, 2022
Bench: Vivek Kumar Singh



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 65
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4417 of 2022
 

 
Applicant :- M. Bhaskaran
 
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Tarun Agrawal
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

Heard Sri Rakesh Dwivedi and Sri G.S. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Counsels assisted by Sri Tarun Agrawal, learned cousel on behalf of applicant and learned AGA for the State.

The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, M. Bhaskaran, with a prayer to release him on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.280 of 2022, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station- Dadri, District- Greator NOIDA (Commissionarte Gautam Budh Nagar), during pendency of trial.

It is contended on behalf of the applicant that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He did not commit any offence as alleged. Further the applicant is senior citizen and is aged about 79 years and is suffering from old age ailments. It is further submitted that no allegation has been levelled against the applicant as the same has been levelled against the co-accused Yashpal Tomar. It is next contended that while the company was in process of executing the sale deed, the allotment of subject land to land owners was challenged by the State of Uttar Pradesh in the Court of Additional District Magistrate, which was dismissed on 26.9.2015 in favour of land owners, so far as it relates to the subject land purchased by the company. Thereafter, the order dated 26.9.2015 passed by Additional District Magistrate was challenged by way of filing appeal before the Commissioner Court the said appeal was also dismissed 21.10.2020 upholding the order dated 26.9.2015, the said facts have been mentioned in paragraph no.16(v) of the affidavit accompanying this anticipatory bail application. It is thus, submitted that no offence under the charges Sections is made out against the applicant and the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. The applicant has no criminal antecedent.

Learned AGA vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the nature of accusations and his antecedents, the applicants are entitled to be released on anticipatory bail in this case.

Let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.one lakh with the following conditions:-

1. The applicant shall not leave India during the pendency of trial without prior permission from the concerned trial Court.

2. That the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

3. The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law to ensure presence of the applicant.

4. In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail, the trial Court concerned may take appropriate action in accordance with law and judgment of Apex Court in the case of Sushila Aggarwal vs. State (NCT of Delhi)- 2020 SCC Online SC 98.

5. The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

Order Date :- 26.5.2022

Dev/-

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter