Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3845 ALL
Judgement Date : 23 May, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 82 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1579 of 2000 Revisionist :- Smt. Sadhana Tyagi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Taha Bin Islam Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Amit Daga Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
1.Notice issued to the revisionist to engage another counsel was duly served but despite service none has appeared on her behalf.
2. Heard learned A.G.A. and Sri Amit Daga, learned counsel for the opposite party nos.2 and 3 at a great length. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
3. This criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C., has been filed against judgement and order dated 11.07.2000 passed by IVth Additional District Judge, Muzaffar Nagar in Criminal Appeal No.26 of 1999 (Ishwar Dutt and others Versus Smt.Sadhana Tyagi) whereby he allowed the appeal and set aside the judgement of conviction under Section 500 I.P.C. of opposite party nos. 2 and 3 and sentenced them of six months R.I. and fine of Rs.5000/- to each. Being aggrieved, revisionist preferred present revision.
4. Having gone through the record, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality, procedural or otherwise, so as to justify interference in criminal revision.
5. Criminal revision is dismissed.
6. Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 23.5.2022
MN/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!