Jauhari Singh @ Jauhari Lal vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others
2022 Latest Caselaw 3152 ALL

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 93
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4157 of 2015
 
Revisionist :- Jauhari Singh @ Jauhari Lal
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others
 
Counsel for Revisionist :- Rohit Nandan Pandey,Sanjeev Kumar Pandey
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Nitinjay Pandey
 

 
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.

List has been revised.

None has appeared on behalf of the revisionist to press this revision.

Heard Sri Sanjay Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State.

This revision has been filed against the judgment and order dated 17.10.2015 passed by Special Judge (DAA) Etah in Criminal Revision No. 21/2014, Rukampal and four others Vs. State and another whereby the summoning order dated 06.12.2013 passed by C.J.M. Etah, under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., 3 (1) (X) SC/ST Act by which opposite party no.2 to 6 were summoned to face trial under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3 (1) SC/ST Act has been set aside.

Learned A.G.A. submits that the present revision is of the year, 2015 and it appears that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest to pursue this matter, and there appears no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and orders passed by the courts below, therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.

I have gone through the judgment and order passed by the appellate court as well as by the court below and also perused the record. I have also considered the arguments advanced by the learned A.G.A.. Further no one appeared on behalf of revisionist to assist the Court pointing out any illegality or infirmity in both the judgments and orders passed by the courts below.

In view of the above, after having gone through both the judgments and orders under challenge, this Court comes to the conclusion that the same need no interference as there is no illegality or infirmity in the judgments and orders under challenge, and further there appears force in the argument of the learned A.G.A. that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest in pursuing the matter, therefore, the present revision is liable to be dismissed.

Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed.

Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned District and Sessions Judge for its onwards transmission to the concerned Magistrate for compliance who will proceed further in the matter.

The file is consigned to record.

Let the lower Court record, if any, be returned back to the concerned Court.

Order Date :- 17.5.2022

Arvind