Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rana Pratap Singh vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Secondry ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 5954 ALL

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5954 ALL
Judgement Date : 31 May, 2021

Allahabad High Court
Rana Pratap Singh vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Secondry ... on 31 May, 2021
Bench: Vivek Chaudhary



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 

?Court No. - 27
 

 
Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 11262 of 2021
 

 
Petitioner :- Rana Pratap Singh
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Secondry Edu. Lucknow And Ors.
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Pandey
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
 

 
Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J.

The case is taken up through Video Conferencing.

Learned counsel for petitioners undertakes that he shall remove the defects pointed out by the Registry within a period of ten days of the withdrawal of lockdown restrictions.

Heard learned counsel for petitioners, Sri R.K. Singh Suryavanshi, learned counsel for O.P. No.2, and learned standing counsel for State.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner appointed on Class-4 post under Regulation 101 of U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 by the Principal of the Institution. He submits that the Regulation 101 was amended by the State Government and it was provided that appointments on the class IV posts in the aided Schools shall be made by outsourcing only. The vires of said provision was challenged in Writ C- No.45060 of 2015 (Principal Abhay Nandan Inter College, Vishnu Mandir and another. Vs. State of U.P. and others) and other writ petitions. The said writ petitions were allowed and provision was held to be ultra vires. The said issue was raised before the Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) Diary No.18529 of 2019 (State of Uttar Pradesh and others. Vs. Principal, Abhay Nandan Inter College and others.) and the Supreme Court has stayed the operation of the aforesaid by its order order dated 19.11.2018 and the said SLP is still pending.

Learned standing counsel states that in view of the aforesaid, the present controversy can only be decided after decision of the aforesaid SLP and submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case the O.P. No.3, District Inspector of Schools, Ambedkarnagar is directed to pass appropriate order on the documents forwarded to him in the light of the final judgment as and when passed in the aforesaid SLP.

In view of aforesaid, the O.P. No.3 is directed to decide the matter in accordance with the final judgment as and when passed by the Supreme Court in the aforesaid SLP (Civil) Diary No.18529 of 2019 (State of Uttar Pradesh and others. Vs. Principal, Abhay Nandan Inter College and others.) is placed before him.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of.

Order Date :- 31.5.2021

Rajneesh JR-PS)

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter