Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mishri Lal Gupta & 3 Ors. vs State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 4552 ALL

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4552 ALL
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2021

Allahabad High Court
Mishri Lal Gupta & 3 Ors. vs State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. ... on 24 March, 2021
Bench: Irshad Ali



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 

?Court No. - 17
 

 
Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 367 of 2015
 

 
Petitioner :- Mishri Lal Gupta & 3 Ors.
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. & Ors.
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Karuna Shankar Rastogi,A.K.Singh Somvanshi,Amarendra Pratap Singh
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
 

 
Hon'ble Irshad Ali,J.

Heard Sri A.P. Singh, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Amarendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents.

Grievance of the petitioners is that they were initially appointed on the post of Collection Amin. On completion of satisfactory service, they were given first promotional pay-scale of Naib Tehsildar and thereafter they were provided second promotional pay-scale of Tehsildar but arrears of the same is not provided to them.

Submission of learned counsel for petitioners is that on completion of 24 years of satisfactory service in the department, petitioners were entitled for certain benefits like arrears of second promotional pay-scale and A.C.P. including increment etc. He further submits that a special appeal No.83 of 2001 (State Vs. Kanhaiya Lal and others) was pending consideration before this Court. Further submission of learned Senior Advocate is that at subsequent point of time, the special appeal No.83 of 2001 was dismissed vide judgment and order dated 29.08.2014 against which Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.5908/2015 was filed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court which has also been dismissed vide judgment and order dated 10.04.2015. In the light of said, the submission of learned Senior Advocate is that now the ground of impugned order dated 07.11.2014 on which basis, the impugned order has been passed, is not available to the respondents, therefore, the petitioners are entitled for the grant of claim of arrears of second promotional pay-scale, A.C.P. and other benefits admissible to the post. Further submission of learned counsel for petitioners is that although the petitioners have been provided second promotional pay-scale of Tehsildar but arrears of the same has not been released in their favour.

Learned counsel appearing for respondents does not dispute that the special appeal No. 83 of 2001 has been dismissed and against the said judgment Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.5908/2015 was filed which has also been dismissed vide judgment and order dated 10.04.2015.

In view of the above, the reasons assigned in the impugned order dated 07.11.2014 is not sustainable in law, therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside.

Accordingly, the impugned order dated 07.11.2014 is hereby set aside. The respondents are directed to ensure payment of arrears of the second promotional pay-scale of Tehsildar and A.C.P. as well as other consequential benefits for which the petitioners are entitled. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.

With the aforesaid direction and observation, the writ petition succeeds and is allowed.

Order Date :- 24.3.2021

Shubhankar

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter