Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6011 ALL
Judgement Date : 3 June, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 89 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10789 of 2021 Applicant :- Mohd. [email protected] Mohd. Hiraq And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Kushwaha,Mohammed Yusuf Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Ramanand Gupta, learned counsel for applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.
This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by applicant in connection with Case Crime No. 246 of 2021, under Sections 323, 354B I.P.C., Police Station- Dhoomanganj, District- Prayagraj.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused and also judgment of the Apex Court in the case of P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198, this Court does not find any exceptional ground to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the present application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
Order Date :- 3.6.2021
Arshad
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!