Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5960 ALL
Judgement Date : 1 June, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 89 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10116 of 2021 Applicant :- Saqib And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Zakir Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Mohammad Zakir, learned counsel for applicant and Mr. Indrapal Singh Rajpoot, learned A.G.A. assisted by Mr. P.K. Sahi, learned brief-holder for State.
This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by applicant- Saqib and Another in connection with Case Crime No.46 of 2021, under Sections 307, 504 I.P.C., Police Station- Narsaina, District- Bulandshahar.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused and also judgment of Apex Court in P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198, this Court does not find any exceptional ground to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the present application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
Order Date :- 1.6.2021
Saif
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!