Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 8449 ALL
Judgement Date : 22 July, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 86 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3272 of 2005 Revisionist :- Ravi Alias Chhotey Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- N.I. Jafri Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,N. Srivastava,S.C. Srivastava Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
Called in revised. None appeared to press this revision. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
This criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C., has been filed aggrieved by the judgments and orders dated 12.04.2005 and 21.05.2005 passed by Principal Judge, Juvenile Justice Board, Meerut and Additional Sessions Judge/Fast Track Court No.3, Meerut whereby bail application of the applicant-revisionist has been rejected and the appeal preferred against the same has also been dismissed in Appeal No.29 of 2005 (Ravi alias Chhotey Versus State) arising out of Case Crime No.29 of 2005 under Sections 376/302/201 I.P.C., Police Station Daurala, District Meerut. Being aggrieved the revisionists preferred present revision.
This revision was filed in the year 2005 for release of revisionist on bail. The trial must have concluded. It seems that the counsel for the revisionist has no interest in final disposal of this revision. This matter also appears to have lost its efficacy due to efflux of time.
In the fact and circumstances of the case this revision is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 22.7.2021
MN/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!