Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 4768 ALL
Judgement Date : 20 May, 2019
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 80 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 920 of 2018 Appellant :- Badkina @ Aarender @ Rajender @ Anil Respondent :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Karunesh Narayan Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant/applicant on delay condonation application.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the accused-appellant that there is delay of about two years in filing the appeal and the reason is that accused-appellant was in jail and because of financial crisis and no body was there to look after the case, the appeal was not filed in time.
The grounds taken by learned counsel for the accused-appellant appear to be sufficient and justified, hence delay is condoned.
Delay condonation application is allowed.
Office to allot regular number in appeal.
List the appeal in the week commencing 22.7.2019.
Order Date :- 20.5.2019
RCT/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!