Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 567 ALL
Judgement Date : 6 March, 2019
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 29 Case :- CONSOLIDATION No. - 1646 of 1981 Petitioner :- Ram Bachan Respondent :- J.D.C.And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.K.Sharma,Pulkit Misra Counsel for Respondent :- H.S.Sahai,A.S.Chaudhary,Anand Swarup Chaudhary,Prabhakar Vardhan Chaudha Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
By orders dated 6.12.2016 and 19.1.2017, the substitution application in respect of respondent nos. 6 and 5/3 were allowed and the petitioner was permitted to carry out appropriate substitution in the array of parties. However, it appears from the records that the aforesaid substitutions have not yet been carried out.
The counsel for the petitioner is granted a week's further time to carry out appropriate substitution in relation to the deceased respondent no. 5/3 and respondent no. 6.
List again peremptorily in the week commencing 25th March, 2019.
Order Date :- 6.3.2019
Satyam
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!