Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 50 ALL
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2019
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 37 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6360 of 2019 Petitioner :- Deenbandhu Respondent :- Sushila Devi And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jitendra Kumar Chakraborty,Yusuf Ali Counsel for Respondent :- Ramesh Chandra Upadhyay Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner may implead the State of Uttar Pradesh as a party to the writ petition and serve a copy of the writ petition upon the learned Standing Counsel during the course of the day.
The sole prayer of the petitioner is that the application filed by him under section 128 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 being Original Case No.59 of 2016 (Deenbandhu & Anr. Vs. Sushila Devi & Ors.) pending in the Court of Collector, District Ballia may be decided expeditiously.
It is, therefore, directed that the Original Case No.59 of 2016 (Deenbandhu & Anr. Vs. Sushila Devi & Ors.) be decided within a period of six months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment.
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
Order Date :- 22.2.2019
GS
(Siddhartha Varma, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!