Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohd. Arif vs State Of U.P. And 2 Ors.
2019 Latest Caselaw 6355 ALL

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 6355 ALL
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2019

Allahabad High Court
Mohd. Arif vs State Of U.P. And 2 Ors. on 1 August, 2019
Bench: Karuna Nand Bajpayee



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 64
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2891 of 2019
 

 
Revisionist :- Mohd. Arif
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Ors.
 
Counsel for Revisionist :- Ravi Shankar Tripathi
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Karuna Nand Bajpayee,J.

Heard revisionist's counsel as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

Submission of the counsel for the revisionist is that Rs.4,000/- to the wife and Rs.2,000/- to the minor daughter have been fixed as maintenance amount per month from the date of filing of the application without ascribing adequately convincing specific reasoning for the same which could justify the adoption of such a course. Further submission is that in the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case it becomes on a higher side and is beyond the purse and means of the revisionist to meet out and comply with the present order. Counsel has tried to place reliance on some case laws, according to which reasons have to be assigned for fixing up the maintenance amount from the date of filing of the application.

Contentions raised at the bar require detailed hearing on law and facts both.

Notice on behalf of opposite party No.1 has been accepted by learned A.G.A.

Issue notice to the opposite party no.2 and 3 returnable within four weeks.

Opposite party no.2 and 3 may file counter affidavit within three weeks after the service. Learned A.G.A. may also file counter affidavit within the same period. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

List this matter immediately after expiry of the aforesaid period before the appropriate bench.

The operation of the impugned order dated 07.06.2019 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Budaun, in Criminal Case No. 665 of 2017 "Smt. Faranaz and another Vs. Mohd. Arif", under Section 125 Cr.P.C., P.S.- Ujhani, District- Budaun, shall remain stayed provided and with the condition that the applicant will continue to pay the maintenance amount of Rs.4,000/- to the wife and Rs.2,000/- to the minor daughter per month that has been ordered by the court below from the date of order and not from the date of application during the pendency of this revision. So far as the arrears accruing for the period in between the date of application and the date of order is concerned Rs.30,000/- shall be deposited in the Court below within one month from today to be handed over to the wife and rest of the amount shall remain in abeyance till further orders of the Court.

It is clarified that in case the revisionist fails to comply with the aforesaid condition, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated automatically.

Order Date :- 1.8.2019

shiv

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter