Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 2328 ALL
Judgement Date : 2 April, 2019
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4900 of 2019 Petitioner :- Mithlesh Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rohit Nandan Pandey,Sanjeev Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhupendra Kumar Yadav Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard Mr. Sajeev Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel has accepted notices on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr. B. K. Yadav, learned counsel, has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no.3.
It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the order of suspension dated 16.3.2019 was passed only in order to harass the petitioner. It is further contended that the charges levelled in the order of suspension is totally false and incorrect.
The matter requires consideration.
Issue notice to respondent no.4 returnable at an early date. Steps be taken through speed post within three days.
Counter affidavit be filed by all the respondents within two weeks. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within a week, thereafter.
List on 25.4.2019.
Order Date :- 2.4.2019
Pramod Tripathi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!