Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 2744 ALL
Judgement Date : 22 September, 2018
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 2 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1111 of 1994 Revisionist :- Sarhaq Ali Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- S.R. Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A. Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
Called in revised. Sri S.R. Verma, learned counsel for the revisionist is absent.
By way of this revision, Farhad Ali has challenged the maintenance granted to his wife way back in the year 1991. This Court had granted interim relief.
I do not find that any case is made out to interfere in the well reasoned order of the Family Court passed in Case No.814 of 1991 in favour of Parveen Akhtar.
The revision is dismissed.
Order Date :- 22.9.2018
Mukesh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!