Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 3602 ALL
Judgement Date : 12 November, 2018
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 18 Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 520 of 2000 Appellant :- Suresh Kumar Respondent :- Smt. Gyan Devi And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Pankaj Mithal Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
1. Perused Office Report dated 9.10.2018. Service upon appellant is deemed sufficient.
2. None appeared on behalf of appellant and respondents.
3. Delay in filing the present appeal having been condoned vide order of date passed on Delay Condonation Application, let appeal be registered with regular number.
4. List before the Court taking up such matters.
Order Date :- 12.11.2018/Mukesh
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 520 of 2000
Appellant :- Suresh Kumar
Respondent :- Smt. Gyan Devi And Another
Counsel for Appellant :- Pankaj Mithal
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
(In Re:- Delay Condonation Application )
1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing appeal.
2. Cause shown is sufficient.
3. Delay in filing appeal is hereby condoned.
4. This application, accordingly, stands allowed.
Order Date :- 12.11.2018/Mukesh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!