Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 1494 ALL
Judgement Date : 12 July, 2018
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 5 Case :- MISC. BENCH No. - 19845 of 2018 Petitioner :- Raghvendra Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Dept. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shabihul Hasnain,J.
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
Heard Sri Ajay Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
The petitioner vide para-8 of the writ petition has submitted that the Chauki Incharge of Police Chauki-Kaushal Puri, Police Station-Gomti Nagar is interfering in the private dispute. He has specifically made Sri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Chowki Incharge-Kaushal Puri, Police Station-Gomti Nagar, Lucknow as opposite party No.6 in the writ petition.
Let the learned Standing Counsel seek complete instructions in the matter.
List in the next week as fresh.
Order Date :- 12.7.2018
Suresh/
[Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] [Shabihul Hasnain,J.]
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!